How Our Looking Ripens Things
“Every phenomenon on earth is symbolic.
And each symbol is an open gate, through
which the soul can enter the inner part of
the world, where you and I and day and night
are all one.”
~Hermann Hesse
The literal minded see me as their enemy.
We barely speak the same language.
I believe in the implications of things.
They believe in the things themselves.
Don’t get me wrong, I know a thing’s worth
like any other.
But things themselves haven't need
for believing in;
they are themselves without us,
objects reflected in a predatory eye.
Believing in the implications
of said things gives them a life
they don’t have otherwise.
Take Gwendolyn for example.
She lives in a tower but longs to live
in a house in the valley
with a garden. She’s conflicted.
The literal see Gwendolyn
through a telescopic lens.
They think she suffers from
the grass is always greener fallacy;
being that A) a garden is involved
and B) a tower can keep her safe from
crime and rising sea water.
But those who believe in implications
have observations far less chaste.
In searching for self empowerment,
Gwen is engaging in a construct
of male empowerment whose aim is to rise
above the vulnerable and defenseless.
In living more vertically she assumes
a defensive position against the
passage of time being as horizontal
as it is linear.
Her longing
for a house in the valley might be seen
as a loss of the eternal feminine
which though positioned lowly
by nature, invites all things
to flow towards it.
Her quest for verticality is a spiritual one.
She reaches upwards for inspiration
for a higher (all seeing) perspective.
Gwendolyn’s desire for a garden is her way
of staying in touch with what nurtures
her by spreading its tendrils,
a green embrace born to be
given as much as received.
Consider Vincent.
Vincent is a hoarder. Everything he touches
he paralyzes, preserves, and keeps
as if in prehistoric amber.
To a poet the image feels metaphorical
but not at all how Vincent sees things.
Vincent is literal minded and does not apprehend
the difference between things as they are
and things made otherwise by coveting.
Vincent’s behavior defies logic, offending
the literal tendency regarding right and wrong.
For the literal, chaos is wrong and order right.
One only sees the gluttony and therefore
their judgement throws up its hands.
If I tell you that Vincent is intelligent
and sentimental, easily hurt, and defiant,
he becomes more like the rest of us.
But the rest of us aren’t grabbing onto
ephemera and holding on for dear life.
Vincent is an over-cherisher.
And here’s the kicker.
His dis-ease is literal,
not metaphorical.
He cares not in dabbling in implications,
believing things are what give life its meaning;
that the things themselves will explain him.
Not, as a poet might offer:
as bread crumbs dropped
in the foresight of finding
one's way home.
1/16/2022